Friday, February 21, 2014

Ron Alting's Flip-Flop Voting Pattern Disturbing

An Open Letter to Ronnie Alting A.K.A. Flip-Flop Alting

By Pat Henry

Dear Ron,

Your vote against HJR-3 recently was very disappointing, unfortunate and astonishing. By that vote, you disenfranchised every voting citizen in the state of Indiana. No matter what your personal opinion on this issue, it should have been decided by Indiana voters, not self-serving politicians in Indianapolis. 

What are you afraid of? If it is such a bad idea to enshrine in our state constitution what is already established state law and has always been true in every society throughout human history, won’t the voters confirm this and reject the proposed amendment? Don’t you trust your current constituents and the voters of Indiana? Or would you rather have different constituents? Apparently you do trust them enough to vote to re-elect you. 

You voted for this constitutional amendment before, in 2011 and earlier. What has changed since then? Were you wrong then, or now? Why? Did you then, or do you now, have basic, foundational beliefs and principles that guide your actions and votes? If so, what are they? If you do, you certainly keep them well hidden. The word “Flip Flop” comes to mind as the best way to describe your votes and apparent beliefs. “Malleable” might be another term. 

You stated that you “wished this issue would go away”. It won’t. Well, Mr. Alting, state senators are expected to encounter, deal with and decide difficult issues. If you are not prepared to do this or would prefer not to, perhaps you should step aside and let someone else who is do this important work. 

In the end, we shouldn’t be surprised. You performed a very similar bait and switch operation when you were on the Lafayette City Council. In 1996, you changed your vote (also known as a flip flop) on the issue of adding similar behaviors to the city’s human relations ordinance. I guess we should have known then the level of your commitment to principles and your constituents.

You have claimed that this pattern of flip-flopping changing of votes is “courageous”.  Others might call it “cowardly”, taking the path of least resistance, taking the easy way out, not wanting to hurt your perceived chances of getting re-elected, or seeing which way the political wind is blowing at any given point in time. Not only can we not consistently rely on you to do the same thing and vote the same way, but we can much more certainly rely on you to take the “easy” way out, the path of least resistance and what you think will please the media and the left (mostly one and the same). But most certainly, you will reliably take the action and vote the way that serves you the best, not us, and is in your best interest, not ours. That is one thing that does appear to be consistent. 

That, Mr. Alting, is part of what gives politics and politicians a bad name, and what makes people dislike politics and politicians so much.

(Don't forget to check us out on Facebook!  There are extra tidbits posted daily!)


  1. Poor Ronnie, he just can't seem to help himself.

  2. I've never voted for him, but I commend his change of mind in this case. You're upset that he doesn't want to discriminate?

    I guess your side bar quote says it all:
    "Screeching liberals need not apply. Their views are over-expressed via the mainstream media."

  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

  4. Your comment is very telling. The people who like Ron's vote on this issue never voted for him in the first place. He betrayed his constituents when he voted opposite of what he said he believed in prior to him being elected. The vote would have given citizens a say in the matter. The vote wasn't for or against gay marriage. Why not let the people decide? Isn't that the American way?

    1. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

  5. This issue did nothing more than divide the public. There are laws on the books that prevent gays from marrying in Indiana, so in the end what have they really won? Nothing.

  6. Laws can be overturned at any legislative session with a simple majority vote. That will certainly be done the first time a Democrat house and senate are seated. A constitutional amendment is much more difficult to overturn, and is much more secure. For those of you who keep repeating the fact that there is currently a law on the books regarding this issue: you are saying that you are fine with that law, want to keep it as-is, will work to prevent overturning it? I didn't think so.